๐ Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 treated in Hubei (epicenter) and outside Hubei (non-epicenter): A Nationwide Analysis of China.
BACKGROUND: During the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), consistent and considerable differences in disease severity and mortality rate of patients treated in Hubei province compared to those in other parts of China has been observed. We sought to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients being treated inside and outside Hubei province, and explore the factors underlying these differences. METHODS: Collaborating with the National Health Commission, we established a retrospective cohort to study hospitalised COVID-19 cases in China. Clinical characteristics, the rate of severe events and deaths, and the time to critical illness (invasive ventilation or intensive care unit admission or death) were compared between patients in and outside of Hubei. The impact of Wuhan-related exposure (a presumed key factor that drove the severe situation in Hubei, as Wuhan is the epicenter as well the administrative center of Hubei province) and the duration between symptom onset and admission on prognosis were also determined. RESULTS: Upon data cut-off (Jan 31st, 2020), 1590 cases from 575 hospitals in 31 provincial administrative regions were collected (core cohort). The overall rate of severe cases and mortality was 16.0% and 3.2%, respectively. Patients in Hubei (predominantly with Wuhan-related exposure, 597/647, 92.3%) were older (mean: 49.7 versus 44.9 years), had more cases with comorbidity (32.9% versus 19.7%), higher symptomatic burden, abnormal radiologic manifestations, and, especially, a longer waiting time between symptom onset and admission (5.7 versus 4.5 days) compared with patients outside Hubei. Patients in Hubei [severe event rate 23.0% versus 11.1%, death rate 7.3% versus 0.3%, hazards ratio (HR) for critical illness 1.59, 95%CI 1.05-2.41] have a poorer prognosis compared with patients outside of Hubei after adjusting for age and comorbidity. However, among patients outside of Hubei, the duration from symptom onset to hospitalisation (mean: 4.4 versus 4.7 days) and prognosis (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.40-1.80) were similar between patients with or without Wuhan-related exposure. In the overall population, the waiting time, but neither treated in Hubei nor Wuhan-related exposure, remained an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.05, 1.01-1.08). CONCLUSION: There were more severe cases and poorer outcomes for COVID-19 patients treated in Hubei, which might be attributed to the prolonged duration of symptom onset to hospitalisation in the epicenter. Future studies to determine the reason for delaying hospitalisation are warranted.
author
๐ค Liang, Wen-Hua
๐ค Guan, Wei-Jie
๐ค Li, Cai-Chen
๐ค Li, Yi-Min
๐ค Liang, Heng-Rui
๐ค Zhao, Yi
๐ค Liu, Xiao-Qing
๐ค Sang, Ling
๐ค Chen, Ru-Chong
๐ค Tang, Chun-Li
๐ค Wang, Tao
๐ค Wang, Wei
๐ค He, Qi-Hua
๐ค Chen, Zi-Sheng
๐ค Wong, Sook-San
๐ค Zanin, Mark
๐ค Liu, Jun
๐ค Xu, Xin
๐ค Huang, Jun
๐ค Li, Jian-Fu
๐ค Ou, Li-Min
๐ค Cheng, Bo
๐ค Xiong, Shan
๐ค Xie, Zhan-Hong
๐ค Ni, Zheng-Yi
๐ค Hu, Yu
๐ค Liu, Lei
๐ค Shan, Hong
๐ค Lei, Chun-Liang
๐ค Peng, Yi-Xiang
๐ค Wei, Li
๐ค Liu, Yong
๐ค Hu, Ya-Hua
๐ค Peng, Peng
๐ค Wang, Jian-Ming
๐ค Liu, Ji-Yang
๐ค Chen, Zhong
๐ค Li, Gang
๐ค Zheng, Zhi-Jian
๐ค Qiu, Shao-Qin
๐ค Luo, Jie
๐ค Ye, Chang-Jiang
๐ค Zhu, Shao-Yong
๐ค Cheng, Lin-Ling
๐ค Ye, Feng
๐ค Li, Shi-Yue
๐ค Zheng, Jin-Ping
๐ค Zhang, Nuo-Fu
๐ค Zhong, Nan-Shan
๐ค He, Jian-Xing
year
โฐ 2020
journal
๐ Eur Respir J
issn
๐
volume
number
page
citedbycount
0
download
๐ [BibTeX]