๐ Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suspicion, who were examined by both CT and rRT-PCR at initial presentation. The sensitivities of both tests were then compared. For patients with a final confirmed diagnosis, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to CT imaging findings were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were finally diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. Thirty-five patients had abnormal CT findings at presentation, whereas one patient had a normal CT. Using rRT-PCR, 30 patients were tested positive, with 6 cases initially missed. Amongst these 6 patients, 3 became positive in the second rRT-PCR assay(after 2 days, 2 days and 3 days respectively), and the other 3 became positive only in the third round of rRT-PCR tests(after 5 days, 6 days and 8 days respectively). At presentation, CT sensitivity was therefore 97.2%, whereas the sensitivity of initial rRT-PCR was only 83.3%. CONCLUSION: rRT-PCR may produce initial false negative results. We suggest that patients with typical CT findings but negative rRT-PCR results should be isolated, and rRT-PCR should be repeated to avoid misdiagnosis.
keywords
๐ Coronavirus (5664)
๐ Pneumonia (602)
๐ Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (1654)
๐ Tomography (67)
๐ X-Ray Computed (1)
๐ polymerase chain (300)
๐ real-time reverse (87)
๐ computed tomography (55)
๐ chain reaction (303)
author
๐ค Long, Chunqin
๐ค Xu, Huaxiang
๐ค Shen, Qinglin
๐ค Zhang, Xianghai
๐ค Fan, Bing
๐ค Wang, Chuanhong
๐ค Zeng, Bingliang
๐ค Li, Zicong
๐ค Li, Xiaofen
๐ค Li, Honglu
year
โฐ 2020
journal
๐ Eur J Radiol
issn
๐
volume
number
page
citedbycount
0
download
๐ [BibTeX]